NVACC Judging Seminar

In 2012 we had the pleasure of providing NVACC Seminar on Camera Club Judging four times during the fall.  There was an exceptional response to the offering, and people from each of the member camera clubs as well as members of camera clubs in Maryland attended.  We hope to increase the pool of judges from which camera clubs may choose.

In response to an overwhelming request for copies of the presentation, we chose to make the Seminar on Camera Club Judging available online.

— Joseph Miller

2nd Annual Joseph Miller Abstract Photography Exhibit

May 4 – May 28 2012

The Second Annual Joseph Miller Center for the Photographic Arts Abstract Photography Exhibit attracted exhibitors from Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Maryland, Virginia and even as far away as Israel.  This year’s exhibit was a resounding success with more than twice the number of images submitted for jurying compared to 2011.  Because of the overwhelming response, the exhibit area was expanded to accommodate the display of 66% more prints than the First Annual Abstract Exhibit.  The juror had a difficult time choosing the top images to display in the limited space available for the exhibit.  Out of 460 images received from entrants, 125 were accepted from eighty photographers.  Most of this year’s images were submitted electronically, with only a small number submitted on CDs.

NVACC has produced a video of the 2nd Annual Exhibit.

* Denotes a Special Merit Award Winner

 

1st Annual Joseph Miller Abstract Photography Exhibit

May 5 – May 27 2011

The first Abstract Exhibit hosted by the Joseph Miller Center for the Photographic Arts.  Fifty-seven photographer’s images were juried in to the exhibit.  One of the visitors who had been to MOMA the week before claimed to prefer the images in this exhibit to those at MOMA.  Some images are not displayed to accommodate makers’ desire to not have their images on this site.

Visual Design in Abstract Photography

Visual design in abstract photography can be very individualistic. In traditional photography one is reluctant to show a house upside down or a dog as green. Lacking the familiar, abstract photography is much more receptive to imagination and creativity. What do we mean when we say “abstract”? Here is one definition: “An abstract is characterized by non-representational designs depicting no recognizable thing, only geometric figures of color and form.”

While abstracts may appear to be different from other photographs, the same design needs apply. One might argue they are even more important given the absence of the familiar. In addition to lines, shapes, texture, and perspective, other factors that should be considered are color, tone, harmony, rhythm, and balance. In abstract photography, the careful and thoughtful photographer (there should be no other kind) may want to consider the following:

  • distribute dark tones uniformly throughout the picture space
  • distribute light tones uniformly throughout the picture space
  • balance dark tones with light tones
  • balance color and/or tone throughout the picture space
  • balance color and/or tone in the corners
  • use lines as in all photography — that is, horizontal lines suggest rest and stability, vertical lines suggest power and strength, oblique lines suggest action and movement
  • introduce secondary motif lines to support the message of the primary line
  • create repeating themes to enforce the primary theme
  • use repetition — patterns, colors, tones, shapes, etc.
  • seek color harmony and balance
  • seek tonal harmony and balance
  • strive for compositional balance — but be mindful that sometimes imbalance can be very powerful
  • avoid the temptation to include an apparent “center of interest” which may alter the entire mood of the image
  • remember that exposure changes will likely change the mood of the image
  • remember that even though the image may not be recognizable, all parts of the picture space should make a positive contribution

Frequently abstract photography is more effective when there is an illusion of texture in the image. Abstract photography, which can be wonderful with or without an illusion of texture, often is misunderstood because there is no “subject”. Indeed, the mood and effect of many abstracts would be destroyed if there were a center of interest.

There is an excellent training exercise to learn to see elements in an abstract. Gently crumple a piece of aluminum foil so as to produce random patterns of lines and shapes. Use colored lights, gels, reflectors, etc. to project light onto the crumpled aluminum foil. Slightly move the aluminum foil or your camera to change the placement of colors, tones and shapes in the viewfinder. Ask yourself why you like or don’t like the different images. Why are some more pleasing and some less pleasing to your eye? When you can verbalize your responses, you are on our way to become an abstract photographer.

Photographers often ask where one can find abstracts. That is a valid question and fortunately the answer can be given in one word: everywhere. The key to finding abstracts is to abstract — that is, isolate, isolate, isolate. Generally, macro lenses and telephoto lenses isolate best. Wide angle lenses, because of their broad coverage, usually include too much peripheral information.

For whatever reasons, abstracts are not understood by many photographers, and indeed, by many judges. Yet abstracts have long been an important part of the art world. From such diverse styles as Wassily Kandinsky to Georgia O’Keeffe, artists have painted abstracts. Much of today’s “Modern Art” would have to be called abstracts.

While abstracts often are not appreciated at the camera club level, many master photographers have produced outstanding abstracts. Think of Edward Weston’s peppers or his shells. Harry Callahan and Man Ray were pioneers in creating abstract designs. Among contemporary photographers, Freeman Patterson’s abstract landscapes are true works of art.

Don’t be discouraged that abstracts are not well accepted in camera club competitions which are bound by traditional dogma such as the rule of thirds, a believed need for a center of interest, etc. In abstract photography talented photographers can elevate the camera from that of a recording instrument to one that creates art.

— Joseph Miller

Photography Has Not Changed

That may sound strange given the amazing technical developments during the past two decades. Since Louis Daguerre the goal of photography always has been to produce a good image that appears within the picture space, be it a glass plate, a sheet of paper, or a screen. It is technology that h as changed as it has evolved from film to digital, but the goal is still the same — to produce a good image that appears within the picture space.

Also, what has not changed is the importance of composition — the choice, placement and arrangement of everything that appears in the picture space. Regardless of the technology used, composition is the the measure of good photography, the great equalizer, and, like it or not, composition trumps technology. Even the most advanced technology cannot rescue poor composition.

I hear of photographers taking hundreds, sometimes a thousand or more pictures a day, and thousands of pictures while on vacation. How could they have carefully composed an image in the viewfinder before pressing the shutter? Obviously they could not. As a result, later they have to manipulate what was on the sensor to produce an image that at best may yield only a marginal composition. That can be time consuming and oftentimes fruitless. The photographer’s time is more wisely spent making the effort to choose the best composition in the viewfinder before taking the picture. Good composition was important in Louis Daguerre’s time and remains so today.

— Joe Miller

Seeing

There is a subject that is not given enough attention in photography. That subject is seeing — how to see a scene we want to photograph. We live in a fast-paced world, but, alas, seeing takes time. Seeing is more than looking, more than glancing. Seeing is examining, isolating, analyzing, abstracting and always asking the question: What happens if? What happens if I raise the camera, or lower the camera, or point the camera to the left or right? What happens if I move me and the camera closer or further away, or to the left or right. What happens if?

One of the many benefits of digital is there is no cost for film. But that can be a mixed blessing. I hear of folks taking thousands of images while on vacation, often hundreds of images a day. How much time did they spend seeing the scene before they pressed the shutter?

One of the most important accessories you can have in photography is — forgive me for saying it — a tripod. Yes, I know you have image stabilization lenses and you can shoot at a fast ISO and, therefore, you don’t need a tripod. If you are doing sports photography, photojournalism, or photographing your kids or grandkids, a tripod is not a viable option. But if you are photographing nature, still life, close-ups, etc., consider the advantages of a tripod. A tripod allows you (sometimes even forces you) to slow down, and lets you examine carefully and precisely what is in the viewfinder.

The fastest way to become a better photographer is to slow down. That is good advice. Slow down, take time to see, study the viewfinder, and ask and answer the question: What happens if?

— Joe Miller